Monday, December 2, 2013

Government and Efficiency

The old joke goes something like this:

What are the three most outrageous statements?

1) The check is in the mail,
2) I’ll respect you in the morning,
3) I’m from the government. I’m here to help. 

The inefficiency and waste of government has been talked about and joked about for ages but exactly what do we mean when we talk about government inefficiency? There is no better example than the Obama administration’s attempt to develop a health insurance website. The cost: $400,000,000. Yes, that’s 400 million dollars for a website that barely functions and has serious security problems. Why so much? Because the government is not subject to competition. It does not have to worry about going out of business if they produce an inferior product. And since they do not have to deal with competitive pressures, governments tend to be lax about productivity and cost controls.  

On the other hand, here is a private health insurance website that works just fine:  


Speaking of ehealthinsurance, they are cited in the following Wall Street Journal article that explains why insurance policies sold by the Affordable Care Act’s exchanges are more expensive and offer fewer choices:     


MM

Addendum: Bloomberg Government now estimates the cost of the ACA to be $1,000,000,000 (that's one BILLION dollars!!!)